为培养学生卓越的批判性思维及论辩能力，让学生自愿践行“万科双语学校学生使用电子产品公约”，5月20日晚6点，万科双语学校第三届家校联合辩论赛——小学部专场在剧场举行。小学部高年级的学生辩手与家长辩手就“学生使用智能电子产品辅助学习是“利大于弊”还是“弊大于利”展开了一场“唇枪舌战”。杨帆校长、四五年级全体师生及部分家长代表出席了本次活动，同时进行了网络直播。

VBS News Net: VBS held the 3rd debate between students and parents in the theater on May 20 to cultivate students' critical thinking ability and let them implement the regulations of using electronic gadgets for VBS students. Do the cons outweigh the pros in using electronic products to complement studies? Year 4 and Year 5 students debated with their parents. Principal Yang, all the teachers, students of Year 4 and Year 5, and some parents' representatives attended the activity.

4月初，学校广发辩手“招募令”，根据自愿原则从各班同学和家长中招募辩手，并确定各自观点。令人兴奋的是，此次辩论赛在选择观点的过程中，不再是学生和家长观点针锋相对，而是家长和学生都有选择正方和反方的，也就是两个辩论队都由学生和家长共同组成。经过了为期一个多月的资料准备与模拟训练，终于到了正式比赛的这一天。将这一带有敏感性的话题，以学生家长联合辩论赛的形式开诚布公地讨论，正是万双思想开放、和谐包容特点的体现。

At the beginning of April, debaters were recruited from each class. It was different from the previous debate that students and their parents were no longer opposed to each other, but both chose the pros and cons. After a month of preparation and training, the debate finally began.

5月20日晚，伴随主持人於姝含同学幽默的开场辞，大赛拉开帷幕。正方一辩张峻嘉同学首先陈词：“智能电子产品进入生活是大势所趋，不可抗拒，而ipad作为智能电子产品的代表性工具正是孩子们通向数字时代的一把重要钥匙。时代变迁，滚滚向前不可阻挡，顺之者昌逆之者亡，而工具本身并无是非对错之分，善用者为上!”台下的同学和老师们信服地不断点头，并纷纷举起手中的点赞牌为正方一辩点赞。

On May 20, the debate began with the opening by Yu Shuhan. Zhang Junjia, the first speaker of the positive side, said, 'It's a trend for people to use electronic devices in their daily life. As a representative of electronic devices, IPad is an important key for children to lead to the digital age.'

           

反方一辩祁润格同学的陈词同样精彩：“要正视青少年无法自律的基本客观事实。未成年人是不能做到自律的，面对诱惑他们的确没有判断力。监护者真正应该做到的是更好地提升自我，做好身教。”在场的观众们尤其是家长代表们纷纷鼓掌，表示认同。

The first speaker of the negative side, Qi Runge, believed that we should face the fact that teenagers may lack self-discipline. They have no judgment when they are facing temptation. What guardians really should do is to set good examples for them.

     

自由辩环节吴萱怡同学气势惊人，她一针见血：“让我们回归到辩题本身，请大家看向大屏幕，一起读一遍辩题：使用电子产品辅助学习到底是利大于弊还是弊大于利?那么我们就来讨论下什么叫利大于弊。我们都知道凡事都有两面性，而弊大于利的东西是会被逐渐约束与淘汰的，而利大于弊的东西则会被广泛普及。且不说对方辩友提出的近视数据的准确性，有一点不可否认的是——在座的所有人，都拥有电子产品，甚至每个家庭都有iPad ，学校在推广ipad全景课堂辅助教学，VBS更是设立了万双云课还有人工智能这两门受到广大学生推崇的课程。这说明什么?说明以ipad为代表的电子产品利大于弊，才会得到如此广泛的普及!”其逻辑的缜密，思维的敏捷赢得了相当多的掌声和点赞。

Wu Xuanyi stated her opinion in the free debate session, 'Let's go back to the topic. Do the cons outweigh the pros in using electronic products to complement studies? We all know that every coin has two sides, and what does more harm will be gradually eliminated, while what does more good will be widely popularized. It is undeniable that all of you have electronic products, and even every family has an iPad. The school promotes iPad-assisted teaching and has set up VBS Cloud Lessons and AI Lessons. What does that mean? It means that the advantages of electronic products outweigh the disadvantages so that they can be so widely used.' Her logic and thinking have won a lot of applause and praise.

面对学生辩手们的攻势，前来助力的大众辩手们纷纷坐不住了。正方大众辩手陈履一爸爸以自己的亲身经历说明“近视的成因有很多种，不是说使用电子产品辅助学习才是罪魁祸首。比如我小时候就没怎么接触，但是我还是近视了。”反方大众辩手胡桐恩爸爸则从当下“人们更容易写错字别字”这一不争的事实入手，表达了“教育的核心是让人成为人，我们要尊重学习的基本规律，回到底线与初心上去，不要让电子技术晃花了眼。承认学习本就是一个痛苦的过程，就是需要努力去落实每一个知识性、能力性的东西。”这一观点同样赢得了在场教师与家长的共鸣。家长辩手们在台上你来我往，将气氛推向了高潮。

Chen Lvyi's father explained with his own experience, 'There are many causes of myopia. I didn't use electronic products when I was a child, but I'm still short-sighted.' Hu tongen's father stated that people were more likely to write wrong words. We should follow the basic rules of learning and admit that learning is a painful process. This view also had the same resonance for teachers and parents.

     

辩论赛的最后一个环节是台下的同学向台上的各位辩手提问，四五年级同学们积极举手，踊跃参与。

In the last part of the debate, the students asked questions to the debaters on the stage. The students raised their hands and participated actively.

     

双方结辩总结陈词以后，辩论赛主席李诗琦老师感慨地说：“从未想过小学生辩论时的观点能如此有的放矢，成年人和小学生观点的博弈会如此精彩!“

After concluding the debate, Ms. Li Shiqi, chairman of the debate, said, 'I never thought that the debate between adults and primary school students would be so wonderful!'

赛后，杨帆校长总结道：“观点没有输赢!希望能够通过这次辩论赛，让每位同学明白，在我们的学习和生活中该如何对待电子产品，让它更好地辅助我们的学习。感谢每位家长，你们的支持和包容，让家校又实现了一次良好的沟通，相信我们的孩子一定会更加理性地看待使用电子产品辅助学习这一行为，创造美好未来!”

After the debate, Principal Yang concluded, 'We do not hold this debate to have winners today! I hope that students can understand how to treat electronic products in our study and life. Thanks to all parents for your support and tolerance. I believe our children will be more rational to use electronic products to complement studies.'

 

最后，杨校长为本场表现杰出的辩手们颁发纪念奖章。含金量最高的“优秀辩手”奖由正方三辩吴萱怡同学与反方一辩祁润格同学获得。海茉尔同学荣获 “风度翩翩奖”，陈履一同学、蒋尚熹同学荣获“优秀应变奖”，正方二辩曾廷轩获“风度翩翩奖”，正方陈履一爸爸和反方朱慕晗爸爸荣获 “最具潜力辩手”，正方刘子毅爸爸、反方王润田妈妈荣获“优秀大众辩手”。

Finally, Principal Yang presented commemorative medals to the outstanding debaters. Wu Xuanyi and Wang Runtian won the Excellent Debater Award. Hai Moer won the Optimum Mien Award. Chen Lvyi and Jiang Shangxi won the Contingency Award. Chen Lvyi's father and Zhu Muhan's father won the Most Potential Debater Award. Liu Ziyi's father and Wang Runtian's mother won the Excellent Public Debater Award.

     

赛后，杨帆校长与家长们进行了深入沟通与交流，家长们积极为学校发展献言献策，共同为VBS学子的健康成长赋能。

Principal Yang communicated with parents who offered suggestions for the development of the school after the debate.

万科双语学校致力于让孩子更好地站在未来中央，让学校成为家长、学生、教师共同成长的地方，本次活动家长、学生、教师三方共同参与，增进了家校沟通，促进了学生批判性思维、演讲与合作能力的提升，体现学校以生为本，平等、民主、开放的办学情怀。

VBS strives to let children experience the future, making the school a place where parents, students, and teachers grow together. The debate has enhanced the communication between home and school and improved students' critical thinking, speech, and cooperation ability.

资料提供/李诗琦

编辑/图片 燕子

摄像/剪辑 侯亮

翻译/晓冬

The documents provided by Ms. Li Shiqi

Editor & Photographer: Linda

Filmed and edited by Leon

Translated by Reny

考高分网 为培养学生卓越的批判性思维及论辩能力，让学生自愿践行“万科双语学校学生使用电子产品公约”，5月20日晚6点，万科双语学校第三届家校联合辩论赛——小学部专场在剧场举行。小学部高年级的学生辩手与家长辩手就“学生使用智能电子产品辅助学习是“利大于弊”还是“弊大于利”展开了一场“唇枪舌战”。杨帆校长、四五年级全体师生及部分家长代表出席了本次活动，同时进行了网络直播。

VBS News Net: VBS held the 3rd debate between students and parents in the theater on May 20 to cultivate students' critical thinking ability and let them implement the regulations of using electronic gadgets for VBS students. Do the cons outweigh the pros in using electronic products to complement studies? Year 4 and Year 5 students debated with their parents. Principal Yang, all the teachers, students of Year 4 and Year 5, and some parents' representatives attended the activity.

4月初，学校广发辩手“招募令”，根据自愿原则从各班同学和家长中招募辩手，并确定各自观点。令人兴奋的是，此次辩论赛在选择观点的过程中，不再是学生和家长观点针锋相对，而是家长和学生都有选择正方和反方的，也就是两个辩论队都由学生和家长共同组成。经过了为期一个多月的资料准备与模拟训练，终于到了正式比赛的这一天。将这一带有敏感性的话题，以学生家长联合辩论赛的形式开诚布公地讨论，正是万双思想开放、和谐包容特点的体现。

At the beginning of April, debaters were recruited from each class. It was different from the previous debate that students and their parents were no longer opposed to each other, but both chose the pros and cons. After a month of preparation and training, the debate finally began.

5月20日晚，伴随主持人於姝含同学幽默的开场辞，大赛拉开帷幕。正方一辩张峻嘉同学首先陈词：“智能电子产品进入生活是大势所趋，不可抗拒，而ipad作为智能电子产品的代表性工具正是孩子们通向数字时代的一把重要钥匙。时代变迁，滚滚向前不可阻挡，顺之者昌逆之者亡，而工具本身并无是非对错之分，善用者为上!”台下的同学和老师们信服地不断点头，并纷纷举起手中的点赞牌为正方一辩点赞。

On May 20, the debate began with the opening by Yu Shuhan. Zhang Junjia, the first speaker of the positive side, said, 'It's a trend for people to use electronic devices in their daily life. As a representative of electronic devices, IPad is an important key for children to lead to the digital age.'

           

反方一辩祁润格同学的陈词同样精彩：“要正视青少年无法自律的基本客观事实。未成年人是不能做到自律的，面对诱惑他们的确没有判断力。监护者真正应该做到的是更好地提升自我，做好身教。”在场的观众们尤其是家长代表们纷纷鼓掌，表示认同。

The first speaker of the negative side, Qi Runge, believed that we should face the fact that teenagers may lack self-discipline. They have no judgment when they are facing temptation. What guardians really should do is to set good examples for them.

     

自由辩环节吴萱怡同学气势惊人，她一针见血：“让我们回归到辩题本身，请大家看向大屏幕，一起读一遍辩题：使用电子产品辅助学习到底是利大于弊还是弊大于利?那么我们就来讨论下什么叫利大于弊。我们都知道凡事都有两面性，而弊大于利的东西是会被逐渐约束与淘汰的，而利大于弊的东西则会被广泛普及。且不说对方辩友提出的近视数据的准确性，有一点不可否认的是——在座的所有人，都拥有电子产品，甚至每个家庭都有iPad ，学校在推广ipad全景课堂辅助教学，VBS更是设立了万双云课还有人工智能这两门受到广大学生推崇的课程。这说明什么?说明以ipad为代表的电子产品利大于弊，才会得到如此广泛的普及!”其逻辑的缜密，思维的敏捷赢得了相当多的掌声和点赞。

Wu Xuanyi stated her opinion in the free debate session, 'Let's go back to the topic. Do the cons outweigh the pros in using electronic products to complement studies? We all know that every coin has two sides, and what does more harm will be gradually eliminated, while what does more good will be widely popularized. It is undeniable that all of you have electronic products, and even every family has an iPad. The school promotes iPad-assisted teaching and has set up VBS Cloud Lessons and AI Lessons. What does that mean? It means that the advantages of electronic products outweigh the disadvantages so that they can be so widely used.' Her logic and thinking have won a lot of applause and praise.

面对学生辩手们的攻势，前来助力的大众辩手们纷纷坐不住了。正方大众辩手陈履一爸爸以自己的亲身经历说明“近视的成因有很多种，不是说使用电子产品辅助学习才是罪魁祸首。比如我小时候就没怎么接触，但是我还是近视了。”反方大众辩手胡桐恩爸爸则从当下“人们更容易写错字别字”这一不争的事实入手，表达了“教育的核心是让人成为人，我们要尊重学习的基本规律，回到底线与初心上去，不要让电子技术晃花了眼。承认学习本就是一个痛苦的过程，就是需要努力去落实每一个知识性、能力性的东西。”这一观点同样赢得了在场教师与家长的共鸣。家长辩手们在台上你来我往，将气氛推向了高潮。

Chen Lvyi's father explained with his own experience, 'There are many causes of myopia. I didn't use electronic products when I was a child, but I'm still short-sighted.' Hu tongen's father stated that people were more likely to write wrong words. We should follow the basic rules of learning and admit that learning is a painful process. This view also had the same resonance for teachers and parents.

     

辩论赛的最后一个环节是台下的同学向台上的各位辩手提问，四五年级同学们积极举手，踊跃参与。

In the last part of the debate, the students asked questions to the debaters on the stage. The students raised their hands and participated actively.

     

双方结辩总结陈词以后，辩论赛主席李诗琦老师感慨地说：“从未想过小学生辩论时的观点能如此有的放矢，成年人和小学生观点的博弈会如此精彩!“

After concluding the debate, Ms. Li Shiqi, chairman of the debate, said, 'I never thought that the debate between adults and primary school students would be so wonderful!'

赛后，杨帆校长总结道：“观点没有输赢!希望能够通过这次辩论赛，让每位同学明白，在我们的学习和生活中该如何对待电子产品，让它更好地辅助我们的学习。感谢每位家长，你们的支持和包容，让家校又实现了一次良好的沟通，相信我们的孩子一定会更加理性地看待使用电子产品辅助学习这一行为，创造美好未来!”

After the debate, Principal Yang concluded, 'We do not hold this debate to have winners today! I hope that students can understand how to treat electronic products in our study and life. Thanks to all parents for your support and tolerance. I believe our children will be more rational to use electronic products to complement studies.'

 

最后，杨校长为本场表现杰出的辩手们颁发纪念奖章。含金量最高的“优秀辩手”奖由正方三辩吴萱怡同学与反方一辩祁润格同学获得。海茉尔同学荣获 “风度翩翩奖”，陈履一同学、蒋尚熹同学荣获“优秀应变奖”，正方二辩曾廷轩获“风度翩翩奖”，正方陈履一爸爸和反方朱慕晗爸爸荣获 “最具潜力辩手”，正方刘子毅爸爸、反方王润田妈妈荣获“优秀大众辩手”。

Finally, Principal Yang presented commemorative medals to the outstanding debaters. Wu Xuanyi and Wang Runtian won the Excellent Debater Award. Hai Moer won the Optimum Mien Award. Chen Lvyi and Jiang Shangxi won the Contingency Award. Chen Lvyi's father and Zhu Muhan's father won the Most Potential Debater Award. Liu Ziyi's father and Wang Runtian's mother won the Excellent Public Debater Award.

     

赛后，杨帆校长与家长们进行了深入沟通与交流，家长们积极为学校发展献言献策，共同为VBS学子的健康成长赋能。

Principal Yang communicated with parents who offered suggestions for the development of the school after the debate.

万科双语学校致力于让孩子更好地站在未来中央，让学校成为家长、学生、教师共同成长的地方，本次活动家长、学生、教师三方共同参与，增进了家校沟通，促进了学生批判性思维、演讲与合作能力的提升，体现学校以生为本，平等、民主、开放的办学情怀。

VBS strives to let children experience the future, making the school a place where parents, students, and teachers grow together. The debate has enhanced the communication between home and school and improved students' critical thinking, speech, and cooperation ability.

资料提供/李诗琦

编辑/图片 燕子

摄像/剪辑 侯亮

翻译/晓冬

The documents provided by Ms. Li Shiqi

Editor & Photographer: Linda

Filmed and edited by Leon

Translated by Reny